K B Chau & Co Solicitors Criticized by Hong Kong Court AGAIN - Flexi Credits Limited v Wong Chi Kit Clement [2022] HKCFI 2052 - DHCJ Douglas Lam SC

周啟邦律師事務所又俾香港法庭鬧?

K B Chau & Co Solicitors Criticized by Hong Kong Court AGAIN - Flexi Credits Limited v Wong Chi Kit Clement [2022] HKCFI 2052 - DHCJ Douglas Lam SC



21. For the reasons above… the Court would expect a detailed and satisfactory explanation on oath from both Mr Ka and KBC explaining the non-disclosure…

Barrister Derek Hu instructed K B Chau & Co Solicitors

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

K B Chau & Co Solicitors Criticized by the Hong Kong Court of Appeal in [2018] HKCA 210 [2018] 2 HKLRD 864! 周啟邦律師事務所俾香港高等法院上訴庭鬧!

周啟邦律師事務所俾香港高等法院上訴庭鬧!  K B Chau & Co Solicitors Criticized by the Hong Kong Court of Appeal in [2018] HKCA 210 [2018] 2 HKLRD 864!  https://lawyersinhk.blogspot.com/2020/10/kb-chau-and-co-solicitors-criticized-by-the-hong-kong-court-of-appeal.html http://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=114747&currpage=T 62.  After the conclusion of the hearing, and without seeking leave of the court or the consent of the plaintiffs, William’s solicitors made further submissions by letter with proposals of directions from this court to the judge.   This is highly unsatisfactory and such practice has been rightly deprecated in a number of decisions , including To Pui Kui v Ng Kwok Piu & Ors, CACV 281/2012, 21 August 2014, at §§55 to 61.  Mr Chua did not seek an adjournment of the hearing to deal with any further point he might wish to address, nor did he give any indication at the hearing he needed to do further research to supplement his submi...
Read more

Alexandra Chambers Barrister Hylas Chung Criticized By Judge Maggie Poon As Unprofessional Harmed Others And Did Not Benefit Self - 鍾元富大律師被潘敏琦法官狠批做法不專業損人不利己

Alexandra Chambers Barrister Hylas Chung Criticized By Judge Maggie Poon As Unprofessional Harmed Others And Did Not Benefit Self - 鍾元富大律師被潘敏琦法官狠批做法不專業損人不利己 https://disgustingbarristers.blogspot.com/2022/03/alexandra-chambers-barrister-hylas.html 香港特別行政區 訴 袁郁鈞 (Reported in: [2007] 1 HKLRD 819) HCMA730/2006 (裁判日期：2007年1月23日) https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=55815&QS=%2B&TP=JU 「上訴人的大律師鍾元富大律師 (Barrister Hylas Chung) 本身對刑事審訊接納證據的基本法則一知半解，胡亂指控聆訊時代表上訴人的大律師不稱職，不切實際地提昇上訴人對成功上訴的期望、做法不專業，損人不利己 (Unprofessional, Harmed Others And Did Not Benefit Self)，絕對不值得鼓勵或仿效 (Utterly Should Never Be Encouraged Or Imitated。」 - 高等法院原訟法庭暫委法官潘敏琦 (Deputy High Court Judge Maggie Poon)
Read more