K B Chau & Co Solicitors Criticized by the Hong Kong Court of Appeal in [2018] HKCA 210 [2018] 2 HKLRD 864! 周啟邦律師事務所俾香港高等法院上訴庭鬧!

周啟邦律師事務所俾香港高等法院上訴庭鬧! K B Chau & Co Solicitors Criticized by the Hong Kong Court of Appeal in [2018] HKCA 210 [2018] 2 HKLRD 864! 

https://lawyersinhk.blogspot.com/2020/10/kb-chau-and-co-solicitors-criticized-by-the-hong-kong-court-of-appeal.html

http://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=114747&currpage=T

62.  After the conclusion of the hearing, and without seeking leave of the court or the consent of the plaintiffs, William’s solicitors made further submissions by letter with proposals of directions from this court to the judge.  This is highly unsatisfactory and such practice has been rightly deprecated in a number of decisions, including To Pui Kui v Ng Kwok Piu & Ors, CACV 281/2012, 21 August 2014, at §§55 to 61.  Mr Chua did not seek an adjournment of the hearing to deal with any further point he might wish to address, nor did he give any indication at the hearing he needed to do further research to supplement his submissions.  There are no exceptional circumstances here to justify a round of further submissions after the hearing was concluded.

Barristers Mr Chua Guan-Hock SC and Mr Kerby Lau of DVC (Des Voeux Chambers), instructed by K B Chau & Co Solicitors (周啟邦律師事務所), for the Defendant (Respondent) AU WING LUN (區穎麟) also known as AU WING LUN WILLIAM (區穎麟)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Barrister James McGowan of Admiralty Chambers Admitted Misconduct in HKSAR v Apelete [2019] 5 HKLRD 574 [2019] HKCA 1189

Barrister James McGowan of Admiralty Chambers Admitted Misconduct in HKSAR v Apelete [2019] 5 HKLRD 574 [2019] HKCA 1189 https://hklawyers2022.blogspot.com/2021/12/barrister-james-mcgowan-of-admiralty-chambers-admitted-misconduct-in-hksar-v-apelete.html https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=125051&currpage=T 36. Before us, Mr McGowan candidly admitted that his actions (or lack thereof) were such as to bring him within the meaning of s.18 of the CCCO. In particular, he accepted that on his part there had been undue delay as well as a repeated failure to comply with the Court's directions, which amounted to serious professional misconduct. 47.  Whatever the position may have been in respect of funding, the applicant was legally aided as from 17 August 2018. There can be no excuse for either Mr Mohnani or Mr McGowan failing to comply with the Court's directions thereafter and no conceivable justification for allowing 7 months to go by from 12 September 2
Read more

Olympia Chambers Barrister George Chu Guilty of Misconduct! 朱奉慈大律師俾大律師公會裁定違反專業操守停牌半年冇鬼用!

Olympia Chambers Barrister George Chu Guilty of Misconduct! 朱奉慈大律師俾大律師公會裁定違反專業操守停牌半年冇鬼用! http:// gettingjusticeinhongkong. blogspot.com/2019/05/olympia- chambers-barrister-george-chu- guilty-of-misconduct- suspended-for-6-months-by-the- bdt.html?m=1 South China Morning Post, 12 Feb 2000 (Cliff Buddle) http://www.scmp.com/article/ 307891/barrister-barred- deceiving-university  Lawyer Counsel Barrister George Chu Barred for Deceiving University Lawyer Counsel Barrister George Chu (朱奉慈大律師) has been suspended for six months after a disciplinary tribunal found he pretended to have a first class honours degree when applying for a scholarship at the University of Hong Kong. George Chu Fung-chee, admitted to the Bar in 1994, also breached a promise to the university not to operate as a barrister once he became a post-graduate student, the Barristers' Disciplinary Tribunal found. The suspension was the longest to be imposed since 1996, and the tribunal took the unusual step of ordering that
Read more

K B Chau & Co Solicitors Criticized by Hong Kong Court AGAIN - Flexi Credits Limited v Wong Chi Kit Clement [2022] HKCFI 2052 - DHCJ Douglas Lam SC

周啟邦律師事務所又俾香港法庭鬧? K B Chau & Co Solicitors Criticized by Hong Kong Court AGAIN - Flexi Credits Limited v Wong Chi Kit Clement [2022] HKCFI 2052 - DHCJ Douglas Lam SC https://kbchau.blogspot.com/2022/07/kb-chau-solicitors-criticized-by-hongkong-court-again-in-july.html https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=145484&currpage=T 21. For the reasons above… the Court would expect a detailed and satisfactory explanation on oath from both Mr Ka and KBC explaining the non-disclosure… Barrister Derek Hu instructed K B Chau & Co Solicitors
Read more